Perfect example for Newton's third law:
A writer from a so called popular website wrote an article against Megastar only to increase their site count. This sort of cheap tactics made not only Megafans but normal movie going viewers angry.
Here is a megafan, who in a most befitting way replied to the baseless writings of the original post author. Here are the excerpts:
* Content in bold is written by original author.
You are one Fuxker gal (are you a gal??), who had proved again that journalism these days is nothing but writing one's gut feeling than writing voice of people. Lets analyse your article on Chiranjeevi's half hearted social service (After all, if you with such a caste feeling also had analysed chiranjeevi rite??)
Wow! What a posh look? It's really splendid, uttered many while looking at the recent marriage functions in the families of Telugu film stars.
It is awesome glitterati, ostentatious flamboyance, and slapdash approach in burning the bucks for marriages that has become common for Tollywood celebrities.
Its all about using words such as Glitterati, Flamboyance etc., that will make people who check web media think that you are awesome. Theres nothing wrong in using such words, but I plead you to use common sense as well along with these words. I wonder if your marriage expenses are just a Mangala Sootram. If Megastar had spent 33 crores for his house, whats wrong in spending 5 crores for his marriage?? After all these days most of the software engineers are buying houses at an average of 20 Lakhs, do you think that they are not spending 3 Lakhs for their marriage?? If their spending of 3 Lakhs on a marriage is justified, then why not Chiranjeevi's spending of 5 crores for marriage?? After all Marriage happens once in a life for every one (ofcourse I dont know about you, if you are married/fuxxed once for a life or once every day)
Albeit there is nothing erroneous in doing so, the concern for needy speaks volumes about a film icon's image. No Tollywood star turned up to help flood victims except Krishna, Krishnam Raju and Ramanaidu.
Why will concern for needy speak about a film icon's image?? They are heroes in the movies and not in the real life. In the real life, he is a citizen like you and me. What had you done to the flood victims?? You are earning for your life by telling people that Nagarjuna had fuxed tabu, by writing sex talk etc., and you are not spending even 1% of what you earned for the flood victims and you are here commenting others??
Chiranjeevi spent crores for his daughter Sushmitha's marriage.
How is Chiranjeevi spending on Susmitas marriage related to the title of this article?? Are you concerned more about Chiranjeevis spending on marriage or his no generosity on flood victims??
He talks very high about his blood bank and eye bank. He diverts some of his income to his own Charitable Trust and declares that he is doing social service. But he did not come forward to donate at least a single buck for flood victims. Why? Is it not giving an impression that Chiranjeevi wishes to rotate his income only around him? He hardly lets out a pie for other organizations.
Just because some junkers are believing what ever your website says, How on the hell of the earth you think that people are fools to believe what ever Chiranjeevi say?? Nobody can declare that hes doing service. Its people who decide whether some one is doing service or not.
Its funny that you are posting a question on whether he is rotating money around himself:
Chiranjeevi has donated 10 Lakhs to TN and 10 Lakhs to AP for Victims of Tsunami.
Mr.Nagendrababu presented a cheque of Rs.2, 00,000/- on behalf of CCT to the children of Victims of electrocution deaths in Eluru through the Collector of West Godavari District A.P.
Chiranjeevi presented a cheque of Rs.10.lakha to the Honorable Chief Minster of A.P.Mr. Chandrababu Naidu for the victims of Gujarat Earth quake-2002.
These are just few things which he did. Where do you place all these?? do you think these are all rotating money around himself??
What is the intention behind starting a Charitable Trust? First, to get Income Tax waiver and next comes the political interest by getting close to people in the mask of social service. Positively, Tax waiver is also applicable to the people who donate for CM Relief Fund for flood victims. Why didn't Chiranjeevi donate here? Either he must have little trust on government or else he wishes to put his money only in his own Trust.
Charitable trust's objective of rigorously increasing blood donations and helping needy people when they require blood had ben almost achieved and you are questioning the intention of why open charitable trust?? Tax Waiver - LOL How many people are donating money to charities after they know that they will be getting Rebate under Sec 80 - G?? For your Information, if you donate say 10 lakhs, you need not pay tax on that. The Tax saving will be 3 Lakhs, but who will donate 10 Lakhs to save 3 Lakhs?? Nobody will do donations for saving Tax. Chiranjeevi is also doing other businesses. If you hire a good CA, you can save this tax in your business showing a lot of losses.
Entering politics under a social Mask - Again LOL. If politics are as simple as donating money to flood victims, every one will do it. Doing social service is not as simple as running a prostitute website like yours.
During the recent Tsunami, writer Chinni Krishna collected funds, food and clothes for Tsunami victims and donated them personally going to Nagapattinam and other coastal hamlets in Tamil Nadu. He tried to inspire many Tollywood celebrities but his charisma has limited aura to attract many. What Chiranjeevi was doing then? Why didn�t he encourage and inspire people to mobilize funds? He might not have big time to do those.
Whom were you fuxcing during Tsunami time that you dont know that Chiranjeevi has donated 20 Lakhs to AP and TN victims and Chiranjeevi fans has donated 10 Lakhs to AP tsunami victims. Do you think that Chiranjeevi fans are mobilized by Chinni Krishna??
It�s clearly comprehensible whether Chiranjeevi is completely service motivated or only half hearted. He might have an Iota of interest to serve the needy but the major part is the interest on his income, and Charitable Trust is a way to protect that. Even if Chiranjeevi tries to motivate people with that Iota of social interest time would do wonders. But Chiranjeevi is interested to motivate people to attract towards his own Charitable Trust. Anyhow, Chiranjeevi appears to be doing more publicity for his Hanuman than inspiring people to help the flood victims.
Whats clear?? Its very clear that you are a caste fanatic and knows 0 about anything happening around. Chiranjeevi was never interested in attracting people towards his charitable trust. We have done a lot of charity from pawanfans.com and we have done nothing in interests of CCT or in conjunction with CCT. Basically, you dont know whats what and had written this article with some nonsense in mind. Its not Chiranjeevis Hanuman. Chiranjeevi had just given voice over to it. Ignorance is a Bliss as you said. But I cant ignore bastards like you and hence my reply.
